🇰🇷 Crypto Chaos: Lawmakers Threaten to Go Rogue Over Stablecoin Saga! ⏳

by

In the land where kimchi meets blockchain, South Korean lawmakers, with the fervor of a Gulag survivor, demand a stablecoin bill by December 10. Yet, the banks and regulators, like bickering apparatchiks, stall progress with their endless squabbles.

The halls of Seoul’s legislative chambers echo with the urgency of a man wrongly accused, as lawmakers press financial regulators to forge a stablecoin bill by the looming deadline. Disagreements over the role of banks, as persistent as a Soviet five-year plan, continue to shackle progress. 🏦⚖️

Regulators Face December 10 Deadline Amid Bureaucratic Farce

According to a Maeil Business Newspaper report, the ruling party, with the subtlety of a hammer and sickle, issued a “last minute notification.” This ultimatum demands a stablecoin regulatory framework by December 10, a testament to the growing impatience of the legislative body. 📅💼

Kang Joon-hyun, a Democratic Party lawmaker, delivered a warning as sharp as a Siberian winter. “If the government bill does not arrive by this deadline,” he declared, “we will take matters into our own hands, legislating through the secretary of the political affairs committee.” 🚗⚖️

Should the bill materialize in time, it will face scrutiny at the extraordinary session of the National Assembly in January 2026. The deadline, a desperate attempt to accelerate the glacial process, hangs like a Damocles sword over the regulators. ⌛🗡️

Related Reading: Crypto News: South Korea Charges Police Officers Amid Bribery Case With Illegal Crypto Exchanges | Live Bitcoin News

Lawmakers, with the tenacity of a dissident, have cornered financial regulators, demanding a stablecoin bill by Dec. 10, 2025. Kang Joon-hyun, ever the revolutionary, threatens unilateral action should regulators fail to comply. ⚔️📜

At the heart of the delay lies a conflict as old as the Cold War: the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) are locked in a battle of ideologies. The BOK, clinging to tradition, insists banks hold a majority stake (at least 51%) in stablecoin issuers, citing financial stability. The FSC, more progressive, views stablecoins as virtual assets, open to a broader ecosystem. 🏛️ vs. 🚀

The BOK, with the stubbornness of a party loyalist, equates stablecoins with deposit-taking instruments, pushing banks to lead. Their expertise in anti-money laundering, they argue, is indispensable. The FSC, however, champions innovation, seeing the BOK’s stance as a stifling force on competition. 🛡️ vs. 🔬

Bank Ownership Dispute: A Legislative Quagmire

In November 2025, the Political Affairs Committee reviewed three stablecoin bills, each as convoluted as a Solzhenitsyn novel. This complexity has made consensus as elusive as freedom in a totalitarian state. 📚🤷‍♂️

The domestic demand for stablecoins is undeniable. USD-pegged stablecoins saw a trading volume of 56.95 trillion won in Q1 2025, underscoring the need for a regulatory framework. President Lee Jae-myung has called for a won-based stablecoin to safeguard national wealth from fleeing abroad. 💰🇰🇷

The BOK, ever the guardian of the status quo, warns that allowing non-bank firms to issue stablecoins risks undermining regulations. The FSC, however, advocates for a diverse ecosystem, viewing the BOK’s insistence on bank dominance as a threat to innovation. 🛑 vs. 🚀

The December 10 deadline is a clear signal of legislative resolve, forcing regulators to reconcile their differences. Failure to comply will result in unilateral action, shaping South Korea’s digital asset future-for better or worse. ⏳⚖️

Read More

2025-12-02 03:26