Will WLFI’s Grand Plan Faithfully Burn Down Circulation? 🧯💸

by

In a decision-making endeavour reminiscent of the grandest assemblies of the past, the WLFI community is embroiled in the democratic process of debating a governance proposal of startling proportions. This initiative, which sits audaciously at the centre of community discourse, proposes the entirety of the protocol’s Treasury liquidity fees to embark on a gallant quest of destruction: a buyback-and-burn program. This valiant act would ensure the permanent annihilation of purchased tokens from their worldly existence.

Oh, how fateful it is that this proposal, having achieved the status of being ‘live’, demands its manifold responsibilities solely upon the liquidity housed within WLFI’s own bosom on life-sustaining ecosystems like Ethereum, BSC, and Solana. Prior to this momentous juncture, those fees gathered under the banners of partner providers or through the foreign soils of third-party pools were immune to this zealous proposal. The execution commands the same meticulousness and attention of a seasoned scribe, where every burnt token, in all its annihilated defiance, is engraved upon the chain for the scrutinous eyes of all to verify.

Where all is Plundered for Scarcity

With a profound statement that echoes in the virtual corridors of time, the proposal declares its commencement:
Route all and sundry of WLFI Treasury liquidity fees to the market to purchase and henceforth burn $WLFI, defying the confines of multiple chains.
• Exclusivity persists to partner LP/third-party fees
• Ensured execution with unwavering on-chain proof of its passage
• Ultimate objective: diminish the circling pool of tokens, offering solace to the noble long-term holders 🦅

Prepare thyself to cast thy judgment…

– WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) September 11, 2025

It is a curious thing, the desire of the community to bind the very mechanisms of their liquidity, the lifeblood of their digital serenade, into a singular, purposeful direction of diminishing supply – forsaking to even think upon other potential uses of these precious fees, which might fund operations or a second, less final fate. The conspirators of this determined path avow that their undertaking binds the network’s very activity to the elusive and noble quest for token scarcity. Observe as the usage and trades grow, and with them swell the coffers of fees, only to be used in the execution of the grandest of burns. This task, they say with a wistful smile, belates sweet reward to those steadfast souls – the committed holders – who watch as their shares grow rare in value over time.

Murmurs of Dissent and Elation Among the Community

The Election and What the Morrow Holds

The token holders, those esteemed participants in the grand financial ballet, stand before a triptych of courses upon which to cast their precious votes:

  • FOR – To dedicate all of WLFI Treasury POL fees to the revered art of buyback-and-burn
  • AGAINST – To secure the fees within the protective embrace of the Treasury
  • ABSTAIN – To hold neither scepter nor shield in this proclamation

If the proposal triumphs, worthy of its fate, the enterprise shall form the keystone of a perpetual deflationary strategy that would sculpt the landscape of the WLFI realm. Even now does WLFI, with ambitions as lofty as the feet of its architects, prophesy that this program could one day stretch out to encompass additional sources of wealth – ever-increasing the scope of its impact as the ecosystem weaves its intricate tales of growth.

The voice of the vote will resound through the operational plan for WLFI, determining whether the protocol voyages forth into the unfathomably deflationary abyss with the entirety of its Treasury revenues or whether it holds back its financial strength for the future necessities of operations and burgeoning growth.

Read More

2025-09-12 09:16