Bitcoin Changes? A HUGE Mistake! 🤯

Okay, so this Saylor guy… the one with all the Bitcoin? He thinks *changing* Bitcoin is… a threat? Seriously? Like, people are trying to *improve* it, and he’s acting like they’re trying to steal his parking space. It’s beyond me. It’s a second or third-degree modification, he says. What does that even *mean*? Sounds made up.

Bitcoin OP_RETURN Changes Must Be Seen as a Threat, Strategy’s Saylor States

So apparently, the Bitcoin people – not the investors, oh no, the *actual* Bitcoin people – are arguing. About… limits. On data. It’s like, can’t they just agree on something? You’d think with all that blockchain efficiency, they’d nail this. Some want to add more stuff to the blockchain, others are horrified. Horrified! Like putting pineapple on pizza. It’s just wrong, alright?

Saylor, who owns enough Bitcoin to buy a small country, finally spoke up. And what did he say? That changes are dangerous! Dangerous! It’s like finding out your dry cleaner is a master counterfeiter. You just… you just don’t know who to trust anymore. He’s got over 630,000 BTC, so naturally, he’s a bit protective. It’s his money, I get it. But still…

He was reminiscing about some “blocksize war”? 🙄 A war! Over *blocksize*! These people have too much time on their hands. And he stated:

Anybody that proposes to change the protocol has to be viewed as a threat to the entire community.

A *threat*! It’s like, they’re trying to… what? Ruin Bitcoin? It’s ridiculous. And he thinks people getting upset about the changes is a *good* thing? It’s… I don’t even know what to say. It’s like enjoying a good argument in the supermarket. Just… why?

He says if he wanted to ruin Bitcoin, he’d hire a bunch of very talented developers and tell them to “make it better.” 🤯 That’s… surprisingly self-aware. But also terrifying. Like admitting you accidentally set things on fire. “The lack of a feature is the feature,” he says. What even *is* that? It’s like saying the best part of a broken toaster is that it doesn’t make toast.

His opinions – which people apparently disagree with, shocker – reflect a desire to just… leave Bitcoin alone. Freeze it in time! đź§Š Because it’s a good investment. Of course it is. It’s always about the investment, isn’t it? But hey, fixing bugs is okay, so long as it doesn’t, you know, *improve* anything. The hypocrisy! It’s astounding.

Read More

2025-09-19 11:58