Chun Wang Slams BIP-444: Bitcoin in Turmoil! 🧨

by

Behold, the co-founder of F2Pool, Chun Wang, hath cast his solemn gaze upon the proposed BIP-444, deeming it a “bad idea” with the gravity of a prophet foretelling doom. “Not a single soft fork, temporary or eternal,” he declared, as if the very notion of compromise were a heresy. Thus, the Bitcoin community, ever a cauldron of fervor, now boils anew, for this BIP seeks to quell the spam that plagues the network’s hallowed halls. 🌌

Wang, who once soared beyond the stratosphere, now finds himself adrift in the tempest of digital discourse. “Devotees of the code move further into the abyss,” he laments, his words a dirge for Bitcoin’s soul. The tension, thick as the fog of a Moscow winter, hangs between innovation and the sacred tenets of decentralization. ⚖️

BIP-444 is a bad idea. Not going to soft fork anything. Temporary or not.

Feel sad that some devs moving further and further in the wrong direction.

– Chun (@satofishi) October 27, 2025

The Devotees Clash

Swiftly, Luke Dashjr, a knight of the Bitcoin Core, struck back with the blade of wit. “Users, not miners, shall shape the protocol,” he quipped, alluding to the 2017 schism that splintered the community like a brittle twig. “Will you, dear Wang, repeat the folly of Bitmain?” he taunted, as if the ghosts of past disputes whispered through the blockchain. 🧨

Users decide protocol changes, not miners. You going to repeat Bitmain’s 2017 mistakes?

– Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) October 27, 2025

Timón of Philus, another scribe of the code, echoed similar doubts, his words a hesitant murmur. “Though I have not yet perused the proposal, a temporary softfork seems a perilous gambit,” he mused. Luke, ever the tactician, later clarified his stance, branding the change “a heavy-handed restriction” that risks stifling Bitcoin’s true essence. 🧩

Voices of the Industry

Alex Thorn, a sage of research at Galaxy, branded BIP-444 “incredibly stupid,” while James Check, a seer of Bitcoin’s fate, called it “antithetical” to its very principles. “Who, with a clear mind, could read this BIP and deem it a boon?” he pondered, as if the very notion were a riddle without answer. 🧠

Yet, amidst the fray, a curious tale unfolds: Wang and Dashjr, once allies in a 2021 act of charity, now find themselves adversaries. A donation of 1 BTC, once a gesture of goodwill, now lingers as a relic of bygone camaraderie, a memory as fleeting as a snowflake in the sun. ⛄

remember when F2Pool founder paid Luke 1btc which Luke then lost and accused Core of stealing it

– cbspears ◉ (@cbspears) October 6, 2025

The debate over BIP-444, a tempest of ideals, reveals the chasm within Bitcoin’s heart. Some see salvation in its clauses, while others fear it may unravel the tapestry of openness and decentralization that defines this digital realm. 🌀

Read More

2025-10-28 10:48