VanEck CEO Throws Shade on Bitcoin’s Privacy, Zcash May Be the New Crypto Darling

Markets

What to know:

  • VanEck CEO Jan van Eck has some questions about Bitcoin‘s “encryption” and “privacy” in a CNBC interview.
  • Apparently, some Bitcoin holders are now flirting with Zcash for its privacy perks. đŸ˜±
  • Technologists are quietly nodding along, while hardcore Bitcoin fans are clutching their ledgers in horror. 😬

In a plot twist that could only happen in the bizarre world of cryptocurrency, VanEck’s CEO, Jan van Eck (who’s obviously got a thing for Bitcoin’s underlying tech), decided to air some concerns on CNBC’s Power Lunch – yes, we’re all watching crypto drama at lunch now. His main gripe? The Big B’s encryption and privacy levels. That’s right, folks, your precious Bitcoin might not be secure enough for VanEck’s liking. đŸ˜±

Van Eck, in a rare moment of cryptographic vulnerability, pointed out that the Bitcoin community is starting to have some deep existential questions about its very foundations – it’s like asking if your favorite pair of sneakers will last the apocalypse. He added that VanEck doesn’t just invest in a crypto craze for a day; they’re here for the long haul. But, just so you know, they’ll bail if Bitcoin’s “thesis” falls apart. Which, he admits, is a vague but ominous concept. What is this “thesis,” you ask? Well, it’s basically whether Bitcoin’s cryptography can survive quantum computing and whether its privacy features align with people who actually care about privacy. Because let’s face it, Bitcoin’s ledger is like your social media feed – everyone can see what you’re doing. 👀

Van Eck wasn’t shy about saying that some of the OG Bitcoin enthusiasts have started peeking at Zcash – the less transparent, more secretive cousin of Bitcoin. Apparently, Zcash’s “privacy” features are superior, and it might just be what your privacy-hungry crypto-addict dreams are made of. 😂 You know, if you like hiding things in a safe rather than broadcasting them to the world.

Oh, and let’s not forget that Van Eck had to throw in some of his sage advice on Twitter (or X, whatever), declaring that the Bitcoin bear market was essentially the universe telling us: “Hey, it’s time for a little quantum reality check!” And in case you didn’t get the memo, he suggests we all start dollar-cost averaging like there’s no tomorrow. Just imagine you’re casually slipping into a bear market – no big deal. đŸ»

As if that wasn’t enough crypto gossip, let’s talk price. Bitcoin, in its infinite volatility, was hanging around $84,643 at the time of VanEck’s CNBC confession. By Sunday morning, it had surged 2.4% to a modest $86,204. Still down 7.7% for the year, though. But, hey, who’s counting? It’s just Bitcoin being Bitcoin. đŸ€‘

Industry Reaction

Not everyone is sipping the same Kool-Aid as VanEck, of course. Oh no. In fact, some folks, like Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin, are all in on the quantum apocalypse train, saying that elliptic curve cryptography (which Bitcoin uses) is basically doomed. He even added that it’s going to “die.” Wow, really giving it the ol’ cryptographic eulogy. 💀

Meanwhile, Scott Aaronson, a quantum computing researcher, is warning that it’s not just a far-off fantasy. No, the hardware progress is “staggering,” and we might even have a quantum computer capable of running Shor’s algorithm by the 2028 U.S. elections. So, yeah, your Bitcoin’s cryptography could be toast by then. 🍞

Then, of course, there’s Samson Mow, CEO of JAN3 and Bitcoin’s early cheerleader, who’s not having any of this Zcash love. He basically told VanEck to stop speaking for the Bitcoin “maxis,” since apparently, you can’t even spot a Bitcoin maxi in the wild. If VanEck wants to dive into altcoin talk, he should “stay in his lane” and leave the Bitcoin narrative to those who actually know what’s up. đŸŽïž

Meanwhile, Zcash (ZEC) is living its best life. With privacy on the brain, Zcash’s market cap has shot up to a solid $9.43 billion, with its token now priced at $578.35 – up 17.3% in the past 24 hours. It’s like everyone suddenly realized that privacy matters more than transparency in the crypto world. Who knew? 💾

VanEck’s comments, along with the ongoing privacy and encryption debates, suggest that the battle for Bitcoin’s long-term survival is only heating up. As the crypto world heads into 2026, expect more drama, more opinions, and more existential questions. Are we ready for the halving apocalypse? Only time (and quantum computers) will tell. 🔼

Read More

2025-11-23 14:42