Aave Governance: A Quiet Power Struggle That Shook Markets 😂🤔

by

In the December air, a rumor drifted through the offices of Aave like a draft from the river: the governance token, that pale echo of a community’s resolve, had shed money. Mid-December 2025 found a public quarrel between the DAO and Aave Labs rattling investors as if a horse misplaced its oats and the whole stable sighed in sympathy.

The matter, catalogued by Santiment in a January 14 report, centered on who kept the purse strings and who bore the banners. What began as a private skirmish among a few accounts threatened to become a test case for decentralized governance. Yet on-chain data showed large investors turning the panic into opportunity, buying what others sold with a shrug and a wry smile. 😏

Governance Clash Shakes Confidence, Then Steadies

It began in early December, when the DAO noticed that swap fees from a new CoW Swap integration on Aave were being routed to an address controlled by Aave Labs rather than the DAO treasury. The thing felt almost ceremonial-like a clerk forgetting to file a second stamp, and suddenly the whole ledger looked crooked.

Previously, those fees had flowed to token holders, feeding the hope of shared upside. Aave Labs defended the change as revenue from a product it funded independently, turning a dispute about procedure into a broader quarrel over governance rights, value capture, and who gets to wear the Aave brand with the most authority.

Discussion peaked between December 11 and December 22, 2025, as proposals surfaced to move Aave’s intellectual property and branding assets under DAO control. The snapshot vote, scheduled during the holidays, drew criticism for timing and process, with major market participants, including Wintermute, publicly opposing the plan. Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy wrote on December 26 that the proposal lacked clarity and risked deepening political infighting rather than fixing long-term incentives. A chill settled over the charts, like frost on a windowpane you’d rather not polish.

As uncertainty spread, AAVE’s price slid about 15% at its worst, contributing to the roughly $500 million drop in market capitalization. But the fundamentals remained stubbornly intact-deposits on the protocol rose around 60% year over year and weekly revenue reached record levels in late 2025. The ledger kept its arithmetic, even as the drama pressed at the glass. 📉🧊

Whale Accumulation and Price Action Point to Cautious Optimism

While retail interest cooled during the dispute, large holders moved the other way. Santiment data showed the top 100 AAVE addresses lifting their share of supply from about 72% to 80% through December. Exchange balances also fell, a sign that tokens were being tucked away into long-term storage rather than pressed for sale-like heirlooms hidden in a drawer during a scandal. 🗝️

Meanwhile, whale transaction counts stayed muted, suggesting steady accumulation rather than feverish trading. That shift coincided with a change in tone in early January after Aave Labs vowed to explore sharing revenue generated outside the core protocol with token holders. Sentiment metrics tracked by the analytics platform grew more positive by January 13, 2026, reaching their strongest bullish-to-bearish ratio since before the dispute. 📈

Price action also reflected the tempered mood. At the time of writing, AAVE was around $178, up nearly 5% in the last 24 hours and a touch over 4% on the week, though it remained down more than 9% over the past month and 38% year over year. For many long-term holders, the saga has become a stress test rather than a breaking point, and with Aave Labs outlining an ambitious 2026 roadmap and governance talks still simmering, the coming months will reveal whether this uneasy truce becomes a clearer model for power and profit in the DeFi theatre. 😅

Read More

2026-01-14 23:41