Robinhood’s New Fund: Wall Street’s ICO or Just Another Tech Bubble?

by

Retail brokerage Robinhood announced plans to launch a fund that would give individual investors access to a basket of private companies. The initiative is positioned as an effort to address persistent imbalances in access to capital markets.

However, the structure has drawn comparisons to the initial coin offering (ICO) era. Though the fund will be regulated, it carries several material risks. Because nothing says “democracy” like letting everyone invest in the same companies that only the elite could before.

Opening Private Markets To Retail

Robinhood formally announced its Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) on Tuesday, anticipating that it would go public on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the coming weeks under the symbol RVI. Because who doesn’t want to invest in a fund that’s basically a cryptocurrency but with more paperwork?

The fund is set to offer exposure to a range of private companies, including Revolut, Oura, Ramp, Databricks, Airwallex, Mercor, and Boom. Robinhood also plans to broaden the portfolio over time, adding more private firms, including Stripe. Because nothing says “innovation” like letting retail investors play with the same toys as hedge funds.

Historically, investing in private markets was limited to institutions and the elite, but not anymore. With Robinhood Ventures, you can now get exposure to private companies like the ones listed below 👇

– Robinhood (@RobinhoodApp) February 17, 2026

According to the press release, customers can request initial public offering (IPO) shares of RVI through Robinhood at $25 per share. Because who doesn’t want to invest in a fund that’s basically a cryptocurrency but with more paperwork?

Unlike many traditional private market vehicles, RVI is structured to be available to a broad range of investors without accreditation requirements or minimum investment thresholds. The fund charges a management fee but does not impose performance fees. Its shares are expected to provide daily trading liquidity, subject to market conditions. Because nothing says “financial freedom” like a fund that’s as stable as a squirrel juggling flaming torches.

“Opening up private markets will resolve one of the greatest longstanding inequities in capital markets today, and we’re excited to bring these opportunities to all with Robinhood Ventures Fund I,” said Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev. Because nothing says “progress” like letting everyone invest in the same companies that only the elite could before.

However, the move has generated skepticism about the underlying risks of indirectly investing in private companies. For crypto veterans, the structure echoes a familiar dynamic seen during the ICO boom. Because nothing says “repetition” like a financial product that’s just a remix of the last crash.

Lessons From The ICO Collapse

RVI provides retail investors with exposure to private growth companies, a segment of the market historically dominated by institutional capital. The fund is an SEC-registered, exchange-listed vehicle operating within established securities laws. Because nothing says “regulation” like a fund that’s as safe as a house of cards in a hurricane.

However, its underlying holdings are private companies whose valuations are based on infrequent funding rounds rather than being constantly priced by the public market. The companies’ reported value may not fully reflect changing market conditions until a new funding event forces a reassessment. Because nothing says “transparency” like a valuation that’s as reliable as a weather forecast in a tornado.

RVI is also a closed-end fund, meaning investors cannot sell their shares back at a guaranteed price. Instead, shares trade on the stock exchange, where the price can rise above or fall below the actual value of the companies the fund owns. It’s like buying a lottery ticket that’s also a stock, but the lottery is run by a group of people who are really bad at math.

As a result, investors face two layers of uncertainty: the underlying private-company valuations and the market price of the fund. The use of leverage could amplify gains but also magnify losses during market stress. Because nothing says “risk” like a fund that’s as volatile as a caffeinated octopus.

Structural risks of this nature were most visible between 2017 and 2021, during the rapid expansion of ICOs. Because nothing says “history repeating” like a financial product that’s just a remix of the last crash.

During that boom, retail investors gained direct access to early-stage ventures, often driven by forward-looking narratives despite uncertain valuation frameworks and liquidity timelines. Because nothing says “optimism” like investing in a company that’s still in the idea phase.

By 2018, many ICO-funded projects failed to deliver viable products or sustainable revenue models. Token prices collapsed as speculative demand faded and regulators intensified scrutiny, wiping out billions and leaving retail investors with losses. Because nothing says “justice” like a market where the only winners are the ones who knew the rules.

The episode exposed weaknesses, including limited disclosure, information asymmetry, and heavy reliance on optimistic growth assumptions. While some projects evolved into legitimate networks, the broader ICO cycle became associated with valuation excesses and uneven risk distribution. So, it’s like the financial world’s version of a party where everyone’s drunk and no one knows the rules.

This structure does not make RVI equivalent to an ICO, but it helps explain why comparisons have emerged. Because nothing says “originality” like a product that’s just a remix of the last crash.

When High Valuations Limit Upside

In both cases, retail investors can access high-growth opportunities that were once largely restricted to institutions, even as transparency around valuations and exit timelines remains limited. Because nothing says “clarity” like a fund that’s as opaque as a black hole.

The key concern raised by critics is not regulatory oversight, but risk distribution. Because nothing says “fairness” like letting retail investors take on the same risks as hedge funds, but with less money.

Robinhood Ventures $RVI, is a major red flag. $HOOD concentrates in firms that raised at inflated valuations like:

– Stripe @ $140B
– Databricks @ $134B
– Revolut @ $75B

A real venture fund would look like:

1. Lightmatter
2. Cerebras
3. SiFive
4. Anduril
5. Anthropic
6.…

– Serenity (@aleabitoreddit) February 18, 2026

When access expands without continuous price discovery or guaranteed liquidity events, investors may face prolonged capital lock-up, sudden valuation adjustments, or exposure to elevated entry prices. It’s like buying a house in a neighborhood where the real estate agent is also the mayor and the only thing they know about the market is that “it’s going up, baby!”

Some skeptics have also pointed to the fund’s specific composition. Several of RVI’s highlighted holdings, including Stripe, Databricks, and Revolut, have recently raised capital at valuations of $140 billion, $134 billion, and $75 billion, respectively. Because nothing says “value” like investing in companies that are already worth more than the GDP of some countries.

Focusing on companies already valued very highly may leave less room for strong future gains. It could also increase the risk of price declines if private-market conditions weaken. Because nothing says “caution” like investing in companies that are already overpriced by a margin that would make a used car salesman blush.

Others contend that traditional venture capital strategies often seek earlier-stage opportunities, where valuations are lower, but growth asymmetry is higher. In that framing, critics shift the debate from access to timing, arguing that retail investors are entering private markets after valuations have already climbed rather than before major growth takes places. Because nothing says “strategic” like jumping on a train that’s already left the station.

Read More

2026-02-18 21:26