Tornado Cash Saga: DOJ’s Second Spin at the Legal Laundry

by

Ah, the wheels of justice! Or should we say, the hamster wheel of bureaucracy? The US DOJ, in a move that screams “we’re not done yet,” wants to give Roman Storm, the co-founder of Tornado Cash, another whirl in court. Because, you know, one trial wasn’t enough to clear the air-or the blockchain.

In a letter dated March 9, the DOJ asked Judge Katherine Polk Failla to set a retrial date for early October. Why? Because apparently, the first jury’s deadlock was just a minor hiccup in their grand plan to prove that Storm was up to no good. Never mind the Trump administration’s policy of ending “regulation by prosecution”-somebody forgot to send the memo to the prosecutors, it seems.

Jury Says “Meh,” DOJ Says “Again!”

Last August, a jury in the Southern District of New York found Storm guilty of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. A slap on the wrist, really, with a maximum of five years. But the jury couldn’t agree on the juicier charges: conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate US sanctions. Each of those could land him in the clink for 20 years. Ouch.

In the land of legal jargon, a hung jury means neither a conviction nor an acquittal. And since double jeopardy doesn’t apply here, the DOJ is free to roll the dice again. Because, why not? It’s not like they have anything better to do.

DOJ has decided it will retry Roman Storm in the fall. Despite failing to convince a jury the first time around, despite making obvious mistakes like calling irrelevant witnesses and not understanding the forensic analysis of their own blockchain evidence, and despite multiple…

– Amanda Tuminelli (@amandatums) March 10, 2026

During the four-week trial, prosecutors argued that Storm turned Tornado Cash into a playground for cybercriminals. They pointed to internal messages and the fact that 96% of users accessed the service through a website Storm and his pals controlled. The defense, however, claimed Tornado Cash is just a piece of permissionless, immutable software-basically, a digital shrug emoji.

October or Bust: DOJ vs. Defense

The DOJ is raring to go, suggesting a retrial as early as spring. Storm’s legal team, on the other hand, is playing hard to get, saying they won’t be free until late September or early December. To avoid a scheduling fiasco, the DOJ proposed October 5 or 12. Because, you know, justice can’t wait-but it can be rescheduled.

Storm’s lawyers have also filed a Rule 29 motion, asking the judge to toss the guilty verdict due to insufficient evidence. Oral arguments are set for April 9. The defense thinks setting a retrial date is premature, but the DOJ disagrees. Shocking.

“While the Government is aware that the defendant’s Rule 29 motion is currently pending, the Government requests that the Court set a date for the retrial to avoid further unnecessary delays,” prosecutors wrote.

Policy Shifts: A Tale of Two Administrations

The Storm case has become a litmus test for the Trump administration’s crypto enforcement stance. In April 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told the DOJ to stop “regulation by prosecution” of digital assets. Prosecutors dropped the FinCEN registration part of the charge but kept the bit about Storm transmitting funds linked to criminal activity. Because, you know, consistency is overrated.

The decision to retry the money laundering and sanctions charges suggests the Blanche Memo is more of a suggestion than a rule. Facilitating criminal conduct? Still fair game, apparently.

Treasury Report: A Wink and a Nod

Just two days before the DOJ’s retrial push, the US Treasury released a report to Congress acknowledging the legitimate uses of crypto mixers. The GENIUS Act report noted that lawful users might use mixers to protect financial privacy on public blockchains. Timing is everything, isn’t it?

This highlights a delightful split within the administration. Treasury says mixers can be good. DOJ says, “Let’s retry the guy who made the most famous mixer.” Cohesion? Never heard of her.

Exactly right @m_mosier_ . It’s hardly an endorsement. But meaningful recognition now by @USTreasury is no small thing when it wasn’t long ago that OFAC smacked Tornado Cash with a blanked SDN designation.

– Paul Grewal (@iampaulgrewal) March 9, 2026

What’s Next in This Circus?

Over 65 crypto organizations have begged President Trump to step in. The DeFi Education Fund and the Ethereum Foundation have helped Storm’s legal defense fund surpass $5 million. Because, you know, fighting the DOJ isn’t cheap.

The industry’s worry remains: if deploying open-source smart contract code is treated as money laundering or sanctions evasion, US DeFi developers are in hot water. The jury’s deadlock suggests the government’s case isn’t exactly airtight.

No sentencing date has been set for Storm’s existing conviction, and an appeal is expected once the Rule 29 motion is sorted. Storm’s co-founder, Roman Semenov, is still at large, while a third Tornado Cash developer, Alexey Pertsev, was convicted in the Netherlands in 2024 and is appealing. Because, why end the drama now?

Read More

2026-03-10 08:36