Revolutionary Pico Prism zkVM: The Future of Blockchain Is Here (and It’s About Time!)

by

It is with great pleasure, and a touch of incredulity, that I inform you of the recent advent of the zkVM, or zero-knowledge virtual machine, which produces cryptographic proof of a program’s proper execution without the tiresome process of re-running the computation. This, my dear reader, is the very key to unlocking trustless verification, greater throughput, and, yes, scalable applications. What a revelation! If Ethereum’s visionary founder, Mr. Vitalik Buterin, is to be believed, this marvelous technology will one day become the cornerstone of integrating the internet with blockchain. One can hardly wait to see it all unfold, though I daresay I shall remain skeptical until the day arrives when we can all verify our transactions with a mere wink and a nod.

Mr. Buterin, of course, has grand dreams of aggregating proofs from various rollups into a single proof, submitted once per slot-no doubt to centralize settlement activity, reduce our reliance on the ever-so-reliable bridge operators, and allow for swift cross-rollup movement of assets through Ethereum. Such a quaint vision of efficiency-though, as always, the devil is in the details.

The Progress in Reducing Hardware Demands and Enhancing Performance

But hark! A breakthrough has appeared that might just silence those ever-persistent doubters of ZK technology. A company by the name of Brevis has unveiled their Pico Prism zkVM, which boasts an extraordinary proving coverage of 99.6% in under 12 seconds and real-time proving coverage of 96.8% in under 10 seconds for Ethereum blocks with a 45M gas limit. You may now wipe that skeptical smirk off your face, for this appears to be the real deal. Truly, these figures are enough to make one question what we ever did without such efficiencies.

It is further noted that Pico Prism has achieved such feats with a mere $128,000 worth of hardware-half the price of traditional setups that require $256,000. This new device uses 64 RTX 5090 GPUs instead of the 160 RTX 4090 GPUs previously deemed necessary to achieve comparable performance. The average proving time for 45M gas blocks is now reduced to a mere 6.9 seconds-down from the previous 10.3 seconds. And, lest we forget, the improvement in performance is a dazzling 3.4 times, a true triumph of cost efficiency and speed.

Brevis, it would seem, has managed to escape the bottleneck that previously hindered Ethereum’s transition to base-layer zero-knowledge verification. The cost of GPU hardware is reduced by 50%, which makes real-time proving economically feasible for large-scale production deployment. The future is upon us, and it appears we have nothing to fear… or so they say.

Existing Issues with Scalability and Economic Viability

Ah, but no great achievement is without its trials. Zk rollups like StarkNet, zkSync Era, and Polygon zkEVM compress thousands of Ethereum transactions into a single ZKP, proving their correctness in an instant. One would think that such elegance could come at no price, but alas, it is not so. Generating a single proof for a full Ethereum block (approximately 45M gas) can still take anywhere between 10 and 20 seconds or more, even with clusters of hundreds of GPUs or ASICs. What is to be done?

The resource demands are staggering, the finality time too long, and the rising throughput a challenge for economic viability. A recent study, based on Halo2 proving systems, paints a rather sobering picture of the situation. They have identified the primary cost drivers-finality time, average gas usage, and transactions per second-and proposed a cost model that addresses these issues. One can only hope it is as effective as it is ambitious.

Memory Constraints

Do not be lulled into a false sense of security, for even the brightest technologies are not without their pitfalls. Many existing zkVMs still require at least ten seconds per proof and face significant memory and scaling constraints. Some take up to 82 seconds to generate a single proof. Ah, the horrors! The Fibonacci input expands exponentially, and GPU implementations, while reducing host memory use, still demand considerable GPU memory. The horror! It appears we are left with little choice but to resort to the magic of continued improvements in memory efficiency.

Memory constraints, they say, can be alleviated through clever techniques, such as using smaller cryptographic fields or adopting more efficient memory-checking arguments. Naturally, this requires a profound understanding of cryptographic practices and a willingness to challenge convention. There’s always a catch, isn’t there?

Performance and Security Tradeoffs

Let us turn our attention, dear reader, to yet another concern: performance and security tradeoffs. Optimizing zkVMs for performance alone can, unfortunately, undermine their security guarantees. A number of zkVM projects are still in development, and thus, lack the comprehensive security validation we might hope for. It would seem that evaluations of zkVMs should consider not only performance but also security maturity. Alas, as with all things, the devil is in the details. Fortunately, Brevis has taken great strides in maintaining security assumptions while enabling Web3 apps to scale with ease. One must simply hope their efforts continue to bear fruit.

ZKPs’ Road to Simplicity, Efficiency, and Scalability

Proofs, we are told, are created in multiple stages: elliptic curve operations, hash functions, and intermediate proofs, to name but a few. With so many ZKP techniques available, it is little wonder that choosing the ideal approach depends on the system specifications and the application in question. ZK-STARKs and ZK-SNARKs are among the myriad options, each with its own merits. But, I ask, which is best suited to our needs? The answer, as always, is a matter of specification, adaptation, and yes, a fair amount of trial and error. It is, as they say, the only way to make progress.

Furthermore, cryptographic standards are, alas, not set in stone. Over time, new challenges will inevitably arise, particularly with the advent of quantum computing. One must prepare for such eventualities by replacing existing elliptic curves with post-quantum alternatives. And let us not forget the scaling issues that arise in systems dealing with large volumes of queries or transactions. It seems that, no matter how far we’ve come, there is always more to be done.

The launch of Zcash serves as a reminder of the difficulties inherent in scaling ZKPs. In its early days, each private transaction required generating a zk-SNARK proof, which could take tens of seconds and consume over 3GB of RAM. The horror! Many devices were simply unable to handle such demands, and shielded transactions were too slow to be of any use. Fortunately, with innovations like Pico Prism, zero-knowledge cryptography is becoming more scalable, efficient, and adaptable. There is hope yet for the future.

Read More

2025-10-15 15:41